The High Court has ruled that a retired
man is entitled to €315,000 from his late mother's estate.
It was found by Justice Roderick Murphy
that the late Mrs. Mary Boyle failed in
her moral duty under Section 117 of the Succession Act 1965 to make proper
provision for one of her sons, Walter Boyle.
In her will, she left all of her
interest in the licensed premises which she had owned with her late husband at
the Square, Kildare, Co. Kildare, to her son Jarlath.
That interest included shares in John
Boyle Ltd, the company operating the pub business, stock, all business debts
due to Mrs Boyle, a dwelling house, and the contents and furniture of the
house.
Walter had sought a declaration from the
court that his mother had failed in her moral duty to him under the Act. In an
Affidavit he said the effect of the will left his brother Jarlath with two
homes, a well stocked business, accompanying property and the benefits from a
lease with Bank of Ireland, which was part of the assets of the company.
Opposing the application, Jarlath Boyle
said his parents made provision for all their children as best they could
bearing all their interests and abilities in mind.
Yesterday, Mr Justice Murphy ruled that
Walter Boyle should receive €315,000, which was to be funded out of Jarlath’s
share of their mother’s estate. The judge also found inordinate and inexcusable
delay by Jarlath in extracting a grant of probate, despite repeated calls to do
so by Walter.
Brophy Solicitors
04.07.12
This is quite an extraordinary circumstance now isn't it!
ReplyDeleteIs Jarlath Boyle expected to pay the full amount as a lump sum, irrespective of his present day financial situation? That would be quite rash.
personal injury lawyer Vancouver