Family Law Blog

Showing posts with label harassment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label harassment. Show all posts

Thursday, August 22, 2013

SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND HARASSMENT

A problem lawyers often have in relation to sexual harassment and harassment generally is defining exactly what these words mean. When does a particular action constitute sexual harassment and when does an action constitute harassment? The government recently introduced a code of practice on sexual harassment and harassment at work and this is included in the 2012 Employment Equality Act, 1998 (Code of Practice) (Harassment) Order, 2012.

Examples of harassment include:-
  • Verbal harassment – jokes, comments, ridicule or song.
  • Written harassment – faxes, text messages, emails or notices.
  • Physical harassment – jostling, showing or any form of assault.
  • Intimidatory harassment - gestures, posturing or threatening poses.
  • Visual displays such as posters, emblems or badges.
  • Excessive monitoring of work.
  • Isolation or exclusion from social activities.
  • Unreasonably changing a person’s job content or targets.
  • Pressure to behave in a manner that the employee thinks is inappropriate, for example being required to dress in a manner unsuited to the person’s ethnic or religious background.
Examples of sexual harassment include:
  • physical conduct, which can include unwanted physical contact such as patting, pinching, brushing against an employee’s body. It can be verbal conduct, such as unwelcome sexual advances, propositions or pressure for sexual activity. It can include continuous suggestions for social activity outside work when it has been made clear that these suggestions are unwelcome.

  • It can also be non-verbal such as display of pornographic or sexually aggressive pictures, objects, written materials, emails etc. It can also include leering, whistling and making sexually suggestive gestures.
Employers and employees should check their contracts of employment to ensure these matters are properly and comprehensively set out.

Kevin Brophy,
Brophy Solcitors

Friday, August 9, 2013

BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE

Can you be bullied by a company as opposed to an individual? 

Following the decision made in the case of Margaret Kelly v Bon Secours Health System Limited in 2012, the concept of corporate bullying was recognised and substantial damages were awarded to the plaintiff. 

This was a case where Margaret Kelly was regarded as a “trouble maker” and she was subjected to systematic bullying and unfair treatment. 

The court decided that the company, her employer, viewed her as a trouble maker and she was excluded from promotion within the company and was subjected to negative treatment in many other areas. She was awarded €60,000 compensation for the “severe distress” this caused.

I believe most people think that bullying occurs between individuals. Certainly bullying in the workplace tends to be aimed at one particular person by another individual rather than from a company or an entire management structure to an individual. 

So, if you feel you are being bullied or being harassed or intimidated by a large organisation and you cannot specifically name an individual, you still have a case and in my view, a much more substantial case.


Kevin Brophy